Claude (auto-RE) 85ad540a7e re: the other four ships are clean; automating the slab check failed ...

Rendered f101/f105/f106/e105 statically -- all coherent, no stray masses, so the
e106 slab was specific. slab_screen.rs tries to automate the check by comparing
each part's min-axis extent to its ship median, but it produces identical flags
with and without the coverage fix at both 4x and 2.5x: it never sees
e106_bdy_03, the part it was built for. The eye used relationship (a mass apart
from the hull), not scale; a containment test is the right analogue and is not
built. Kept for what it does show: f002_bdy_22's 100000-unit tether and
t901_e01_D's mast are legitimate, and capture-verified f101_bdy_01 flags at 6x.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-08-12 07:22:43 +00:00

3.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw