ad45873a1b
Priority aging in xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs:pick_runnable
(effective_priority = base + age_bonus(now_round - last_run_round),
capped at +31, AGING_ROUNDS_PER_BONUS=1). Strict-priority was parking
priority=0 threads behind CPU-bound priority=15 audio mixer
(sub_824D1328 guest spinwait at PC=0x824d1404 on CPU5). Aging
eventually picks the starved thread, breaking the producer-consumer
cycle that caused 5-tid wedge at PC=0x824ac578 since AUDIT-049 (10 May).
Cascade observed: tid=13 clean exit; events 121K -> 13M (107x); last
host_ns 767ms -> 51,011ms (66x); 8 new threads spawn; VdSwap 1 -> 2.
Complete two-day iterate sequence (2026-05-27 -> 2026-05-28):
- 2.F: VdSwap drain timeout 900ms -> 1ms (xenia-gpu/handle.rs); 876x
perf win on VdSwap kernel callback
- 2.H: vA0000000 physical heap bucket added (state.rs, exports.rs);
ctx_ptrs now in 0xA0000000-0xBFFFFFFF range matching canary
- 2.L: Phase-A diff harness categorized [return_value mismatch],
[status mismatch], [args_resolved.path mismatch] tags
(tools/diff-events/diff_events.py); closes reading-error #41
(silent test-harness state leak invalidating trace diffs)
- 2.M: always-on exit-thread-state.json sibling to Phase-A JSONL
(event_log.rs + xenia-app/main.rs); closes reading-error #42
(Phase-A blind to blocked-forever waits)
- 2.Q: signal.match kernel instrumentation in NtSetEvent /
NtReleaseSemaphore / KeSetEvent / KeReleaseSemaphore
(exports.rs); emits target_handle + waiter_count + waiter_tids
- 2.T: wake.requested kernel instrumentation in wake_eligible_waiters
(exports.rs); emits target_tid + transition + new_state
- 2.V: scheduler priority aging (xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs) [keystone]
Plus accumulated WIP from earlier May (contention_manifest,
phase_b_snapshot, xam/xaudio enhancements, analysis db, xex loader,
xenia-app main loop, etc.). Audit-runs/ artifacts remain untracked
per project convention.
Tests: 300 xenia-cpu / 227 xenia-kernel / 5 xenia-app / 19 xenia-path
/ 30+ smaller suites -- all PASS, 0 regressions. Determinism preserved
(2x cold runs bit-identical at 13,003,881 events post-2.V).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
54 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
address: 0x821B55D8
|
||
classification: normal_callee
|
||
confidence: high
|
||
last_audit: 064
|
||
aliases:
|
||
- "AUDIT-058 caller-ladder fn #5 (vtable slot 6 of class containing 0x82172D88 dispatcher)"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# sub_821B55D8 — vtable slot 6 invoked from sub_82172BA0 dispatcher
|
||
|
||
## Synopsis
|
||
|
||
Normal callee dispatched via the `bctrl` at `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8` (PC `0x82172D88`) — slot 6 of some game-object vtable (offset 24 = `lwz r11, 24(r11)`). Calls [sub_824F8398](sub_824F8398.md) at PC `0x821B5B5C` (=+0x584). Note the **only static caller is via `b` (jump, NOT bl)** from `sub_821B6DF4+0x40` — that's the MSVC EH catch-handler trampoline at PC `0x821B6E34`. **AUDIT-064 falsifies the AUDIT-058 framing that this is reached primarily via the EH path**: at runtime it's reached via the `bctrl` slot-6 dispatch from `sub_82172BA0`, not via the EH thunk.
|
||
|
||
## Evidence
|
||
|
||
- Disasm prolog at `0x821B55D8`: `mflr r12; bl 0x825F0F74; stfd f31, -88(r1); subi r31, r1, 368; stwu r1, -368(r1); mr r30, r3; ...` — standard normal-callee prolog. Uses `subi r31, r1, 368` (frame-pointer is `r1-368`), NOT MSVC EH-handler's `subi r31, r12, N`.
|
||
- Function size: 2076 bytes / 519 insns. `has_eh=True`, `frame_size=0` per DB (but the actual stack alloc is 368 bytes — `frame_size=0` likely indicates dynamic).
|
||
- Static caller xref (sole): PC `0x821B6E34` inside `sub_821B6DF4` via `kind=j insn=b` (unconditional branch, NOT bl). This is an EH catch-handler trampoline that tail-jumps into this fn's body — it's how the MSVC EH machinery enters the fn AFTER a matching exception is caught. Pattern at `0x821B6E30..0x821B6E34`: `lwz r3, 8(r3); b 0x821B55D8`.
|
||
- AUDIT-064 canary 60s probe: fires 1× with `lr=0x82172D8C r3=BCCC52C0 r4=FFFFFFFF r5=01000000 r6=00000000` on tid=6. `lr=0x82172D8C` is the post-bctrl PC inside `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8`. Reproduced at 120s and 180s.
|
||
- AUDIT-064 ours `--ctor-probe=0x821B55D8` -n 500M: **0 fires**.
|
||
|
||
## Activation
|
||
|
||
**Primary (runtime)**: vtable slot 6 dispatch from `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8 bctrl` (PC `0x82172D88`). The dispatcher walks an array of objects (loaded from `[r29+56]`) and invokes vtable slot 6 on each. Slot 6 = `lwz r11, 24(r11)` where r11 is the vtable.
|
||
|
||
**Secondary (EH path)**: MSVC catch-handler at `sub_821B6DF4+0x40` tail-jumps here when a matching exception is caught. Not the runtime activation path observed in either engine at this horizon.
|
||
|
||
## Static graph
|
||
|
||
- Static callers (DB):
|
||
- `sub_821B6DF4+0x40` via `b 0x821B55D8` (EH thunk, NOT a `bl` — reached via exception dispatch only).
|
||
- No `bl` static callers recorded — but **AUDIT-064 captured `lr=0x82172D8C` at runtime fire**, meaning the actual `bl`-equivalent caller is the bctrl at `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8`. The static analyzer's ind_call list for PC `0x82172D88` includes many observed targets but NOT this fn (gap in the dynamic-target inference).
|
||
- Callees: `sub_824F8398` at PC `0x821B5B5C`, plus many others (`sub_821707C0`, `sub_822F13B0`, `sub_822F2A00`, `sub_823C2990`, ...).
|
||
|
||
## Audit log
|
||
|
||
- **AUDIT-064 (2026-05-12)** — disasm confirms normal-callee prolog (refutes "EH handler" hypothesis). Canary fires 1× / ours 0×. **Real runtime caller is `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8 bctrl`, NOT `sub_821B6DF4` EH thunk.** The DB xref via `b` from EH is a secondary entry path. **New reading-error class observed**: static xrefs for `bctrl` indirect targets are populated by some dynamic-target inference but it has gaps — must cross-check at runtime via `--audit_61_branch_probe_pcs` + LR resolution. [confirmed]
|
||
- **AUDIT-058 (2026-05-10)** — flagged as part of static caller ladder under `sub_821B6DF4`. [STATUS: partially falsified by AUDIT-064 — the runtime path is the bctrl from sub_82172BA0, not the EH thunk.]
|
||
|
||
## Open questions
|
||
|
||
- Which class's vtable has slot 6 = `sub_821B55D8`? The instance loaded by `sub_82172BA0` at `[r3+24]` from the array. Possibly `silph::GamePart_Title` or a sibling — would need to enumerate `sub_82172BA0`'s array-walk target instances at runtime.
|
||
- Why does the DB's `xrefs` (kind=`ind_call`) for source `0x82172D88` not list `sub_821B55D8` as a target? The dynamic-target inference appears to populate from a separate trace, missing this one.
|
||
|
||
## Cross-references
|
||
|
||
- Callees: `sub_824F8398` (PC `0x821B5B5C`).
|
||
- EH-secondary entry: `sub_821B6DF4+0x40` (`b 0x821B55D8`).
|
||
- Runtime caller (bctrl): `sub_82172BA0+0x1E8` (PC `0x82172D88`).
|
||
- Audits: 058, 060, 064.
|
||
- Artifacts: `audit-runs/audit-064-activation-ladder/canary-{60,120,180}s.log`, `canary-upstream-60s.log`.
|