Priority aging in xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs:pick_runnable
(effective_priority = base + age_bonus(now_round - last_run_round),
capped at +31, AGING_ROUNDS_PER_BONUS=1). Strict-priority was parking
priority=0 threads behind CPU-bound priority=15 audio mixer
(sub_824D1328 guest spinwait at PC=0x824d1404 on CPU5). Aging
eventually picks the starved thread, breaking the producer-consumer
cycle that caused 5-tid wedge at PC=0x824ac578 since AUDIT-049 (10 May).
Cascade observed: tid=13 clean exit; events 121K -> 13M (107x); last
host_ns 767ms -> 51,011ms (66x); 8 new threads spawn; VdSwap 1 -> 2.
Complete two-day iterate sequence (2026-05-27 -> 2026-05-28):
- 2.F: VdSwap drain timeout 900ms -> 1ms (xenia-gpu/handle.rs); 876x
perf win on VdSwap kernel callback
- 2.H: vA0000000 physical heap bucket added (state.rs, exports.rs);
ctx_ptrs now in 0xA0000000-0xBFFFFFFF range matching canary
- 2.L: Phase-A diff harness categorized [return_value mismatch],
[status mismatch], [args_resolved.path mismatch] tags
(tools/diff-events/diff_events.py); closes reading-error #41
(silent test-harness state leak invalidating trace diffs)
- 2.M: always-on exit-thread-state.json sibling to Phase-A JSONL
(event_log.rs + xenia-app/main.rs); closes reading-error #42
(Phase-A blind to blocked-forever waits)
- 2.Q: signal.match kernel instrumentation in NtSetEvent /
NtReleaseSemaphore / KeSetEvent / KeReleaseSemaphore
(exports.rs); emits target_handle + waiter_count + waiter_tids
- 2.T: wake.requested kernel instrumentation in wake_eligible_waiters
(exports.rs); emits target_tid + transition + new_state
- 2.V: scheduler priority aging (xenia-cpu/scheduler.rs) [keystone]
Plus accumulated WIP from earlier May (contention_manifest,
phase_b_snapshot, xam/xaudio enhancements, analysis db, xex loader,
xenia-app main loop, etc.). Audit-runs/ artifacts remain untracked
per project convention.
Tests: 300 xenia-cpu / 227 xenia-kernel / 5 xenia-app / 19 xenia-path
/ 30+ smaller suites -- all PASS, 0 regressions. Determinism preserved
(2x cold runs bit-identical at 13,003,881 events post-2.V).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.9 KiB
3.9 KiB
address, classification, confidence, last_audit, aliases
| address | classification | confidence | last_audit | aliases | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x824ACB38 | crt_init_driver | high | 060 |
|
sub_824ACB38 — CRT init driver / vtable-slot enumerator
Synopsis
CRT-style driver called from entry_point (or near it). Body is 224 bytes (0x824ACB38..0x824ACC18). Contains two enumeration loops over fnptr-array regions at 0x82870xxx. AUDIT-050 framed it as "iterates 0x82870xxx fnptr arrays (557 slots, 82 non-NULL)" and concluded a half-bootstrapped state; AUDIT-060 found this framing semantically misleading — the slots are runtime vtable-registration entries, not C++ static initializers, and the "82 non-NULL" count obscures a structural 160-slot intentional zero gap.
Evidence
- Body anatomy at
0x824ACB38..0x824ACC18(AUDIT-060 disasm):+0x00..+0x2C— preamble + one optional dispatch through fn-ptr at[0x82023F08](=0x825F1630, an LZ-runtime thunk).+0x30..+0x6C— loop A: enumerate u32 slots in[0x828708C8, 0x828708D4)— 3 slots. Filter: non-NULL.bctrlat0x824ACBA0.+0x80..+0xB8— loop B: enumerate u32 slots in[0x82870010, 0x828708C4)— 557 slots. Filter: non-NULL AND!= 0xFFFFFFFF.bctrlat0x824ACBEC.+0xC4— epilogue,blr.
- Array layout (AUDIT-060 dumped at -n 1M and -n 500M; both identical):
0x82870010..0x828702E8— populated with0x82xxxxxxpointers (vtable methods).0x828702F0..0x82870580— PERMANENTLY ZERO across both dumps (160 of 557 slots = 28.7%).0x82870590..0x828708C4— populated with0x82xxxxxxpointers.0x828708C8..0x828708D4— loop-A array, populated (small CRT helpers).
- Static-DB cross-check: the 557-slot region contains 14+ separate small
vtable-classified arrays at0x82870014/0x24/0x94/0xC8/0x16C/0x214/0x238/0x250/0x2A8/0x2C0/0x2E4/0x5A0/0x62C/0x870, NOT a single CRT static-ctor list. NO statically-detected arrays in[0x82870300, 0x828705A0)— the gap is intentional padding between two vtable clusters.
Activation
Called once from entry_point-near code (per AUDIT-050 — exact caller PC not in AUDIT-060 trace). The driver enumerates all slot entries; each non-NULL entry is bctrl'd once.
Static graph
- Static callers: 1 (from boot entry path; exact PC to confirm).
- Callees: indirect (
bctrl) — targets are the contents of the enumerated slots.
Audit log
- AUDIT-060 (2026-05-12) — disassembled body, identified structure (2 loops, gap), confirmed slot contents are runtime vtable entries rather than C++ static-ctor function pointers. The "82 non-NULL" AUDIT-050 count was correct per-slot but missed the structural 160-slot intentional gap. Driver fires 1× at -n 500M as expected (single boot enumeration). [confirmed]
- AUDIT-050 (2026-05-10) — framed as "CRT driver iterates 0x82870xxx fnptr arrays (557 slots, 82 non-NULL)". Structurally correct but semantically misleading ("static-ctor list" implication was wrong). [STATUS: partially superseded by AUDIT-060 — the "iterate fnptr array" claim stands; the "static-ctor list" implication does not.]
Open questions
- What invokes this driver in
entry_point? Find exact caller PC. - Are the 14+ small vtable clusters in
[0x82870010, 0x828708C4)enumerated by THIS driver, or by separate driver functions? If multiple drivers exist for the same region, the gap might be region-partitioning, not padding. - For ours: are all 397 non-NULL slots dispatched at runtime? If some slot dispatch falls through (e.g. predicate skips it), that would be a real bug — needs runtime confirmation via
--branch-probe=0x824ACBA0,0x824ACBEC(loop bodies).
Cross-references
- LZ-runtime thunk at
+0x00..+0x2C:0x825F1630. - Fnptr-array region:
0x82870010..0x828708D4. - Audits: 045 (DB schema caveat:
v_call_graphusesxrefs.source; preferxrefs.source_func), 050, 060. - Artifacts:
audit-runs/audit-060-fnptr-array-bootstrap/ours-dump-500M.stdout.