Separating the two interleaved arrays by address and re-running the same three
criteria: array A (2509 records) gives byte3==1 at 100.00%, a valid cell index
at 100.00%, and the sphere reaching that cell at 99.92%. Array B (6467) gives
30.65% and 30.60% -- a different record type, and the control showing A's 100%
is not what any 32-byte block would score.
So array A is the per-cell record: cell index (x,y,z), count, pointer into array
B, bounding sphere -- the same role REGN's section 3 plays. That confirms the
earlier 50% was the interleaving artifact and not a half-working reading.
The split was crude, first-half-by-address giving 2509 vs 6467 rather than an
even cut, and A still came out at 100%. A rough partition isolating a perfect
population is stronger than a careful one isolating a good-ish population.
Array B's layout is still unread.
e684eb45dd