The activation decision is code, and MISSION already says the port
authors the sequence -- so the useful move is to hand over the sequence
measured rather than chase the code. From the 235-frame draw capture, at
1 frame = 1/30 s (2 units/frame, 1 unit = 1/60 s, both settled in Q1):
publisher: SQUARE ENIX logo f1-90 90 frames 3.00 s+ at 0.00
(gap, nothing drawn) f91-93 3 frames 0.10 s at 3.00
developer: both glows f94-115 22 frames 0.73 s at 3.10
developer: both logos f116-211 96 frames 3.20 s at 3.83
Three limits, stated with the numbers rather than after them. The capture
opens with palogo_sqex already at a=255, so the publisher phase began
before the window and 3.00 s is a FLOOR -- every "starts at" is relative
to the capture, not to boot. palogo_anima and palogo_anima_eff get 0
draws in all 214 frames, so a third pair's phase is not in this
measurement. And it is one capture, one run: the glow->logo switch being
a single frame boundary with no overlap is a strong shape, but each
duration is one sample.
What is solid is the part that matters: the 0.73 s and 3.20 s phases are
each within 2% of their element's declared span, so the durations are the
bundle's own and only the ordering is authored. That is the difference
between a port transcribing timing and inventing it.
11aa4ec7cf